Representational image | A file photo of the IIM-Ahmedabad campus.. | Photo: Commons
Representational image | A file photo of the IIM-Ahmedabad campus.. | Photo: Commons
Text Size:

New Delhi: A growing chorus of architects, heritage experts and historians have criticised the IIM-A’s decision to demolish 14 dormitories that were designed by legendary American architect Louis Kahn.

Kahn, who is known as an exponent of exposed-brick architecture, conceptualised and built 18 dormitories within the Ahmedabad campus of the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) in 1974 and according to Director Errol D’Souza, 14 of these will be destroyed since they are “unsafe for living”.

Ads code goes here

However, many organisations and individuals — both within the country and abroad — have written to the institute, urging the management to reconsider the decision.

Most of them have highlighted the need to conserve such historic buildings and underlined the importance of preserving cultural heritage.

When ThePrint reached IIM-A’s communications team for a comment via text message, a member said no further steps have been taken by the management on the decision.


Also read: IIM-Ahmedabad alumni slam demolish drive, say buildings in other nations stand for 100 yrs


Letter from UNESCO advisory body

In a letter Sunday, Members of the International Council on Monuments and Sites, an advisory body to UNESCO, underlined the importance of adopting a conservation-centric approach when dealing with such structures.

The three-page letter, addressed to Kumar Mangalam Birla, chairman of the Governing Council of IIM-A, brought together the observations and recommendations of more than 350 heritage professionals across the country.

“IIM-A, seems to be grappling with a dilemma of “Conservation vs Redevelopment”, choosing between one or the other. Conservation today is understood as being an integral part of all development activity and is the major driver of future plans for highly significant areas and groups of celebrated buildings such as the IIM-A campus,” the letter read.

The council suggested putting the demolition plans on hold till all conservation-related aspects were examined by a team of national and international experts.

It added that the management should also prepare a ‘Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan’, in a scientific manner, “to address issues of future development and upgrading IIM-A infrastructure”.

Furthermore, the international organisation also offered expert technical guidance for conservation.

“ICOMOS India will be pleased to offer technical guidance and advice through the conservation experts of ICOMOS India’s National Scientific Committees of Twentieth Century Heritage and Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage among others,” the letter added.


Also read: Edwin Lutyens’ Delhi is unique. India’s political class must not tamper with it


‘Nihilist decision, cultural vandalism’

In a letter dated 22 December, Kahn’s children Sue Ann Kahn, Alexandra Tyng and Nathaniel Kahn wrote to Director Errol D’souza expressing their shock and dismay over the decision.

“Please reconsider this precipitous decision. Allow us the opportunity to speak with you and the IIMA board, so that options can be explored and this impending disaster can be averted,” they wrote.

On 17 December, William J.R. Curtis, a celebrated British architectural historian, also wrote a letter to D’souza expressing his concerns about the demolition plans.

“In my view this would constitute an act of cultural vandalism which will hang around the neck of your institution for ever…,” he wrote.

Curtis added: “You are the temporary custodians of a work of universal patrimony. Please protect it and pass it to our future generations.”

He also called the decision “nihilistic” in his letter and said that he abhorred the idea of setting up “lesser buildings” in their stead.

Indian architect B.V. Doshi, a Padma Bhushan awardee and designer of the IIM Bangalore campus, also expressed his displeasure over the decision. Similarly, Professor Vishaan Chakrabarti, a US-based architect and professor at the University of California, Berkley, asked the IIM authorities to not take the decision “unilaterally” and instead urged them to show “sensitivity with all the significant structures”.


Also read: Why Delhi’s grand monuments will always remember young archaeologist Gordon Sanderson


 

2 Comments Share Your Views

2 COMMENTS

  1. if they really wrote such letters, then :: Wonder why people think this is a historic building being built only recently in 1974. Compare this other structures which were hundreds of years old and in bad state. No body cares about those architectural wonders which ASI is not able to take over due to paucity of funds. The letter writers have no clue about more important and irreplaceable structures all over the country.
    Also , wonder how those buildings were so designed (and built) which made them so un-livable in such a span of time.

  2. The fact that this woke crowd is opposing the plan means that this is a good move for IIM-A and India. Let’s ignore this mafia and proceed with the reconstruction plan – this time with Indian architects and designers.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here